The United States signed its first « safe third country » agreement with Canada. Basically, if you go through the U.S. to claim asylum in Canada, or vice versa, you will go back because the U.S. and Canada are considered safe enough for asylum seekers and equipped to handle refugee and refugee claims fairly. In practical terms, the legislation requires that the review of a designated country be based on the following four factors: as of February 2017, the number of refugee claimants has begun to cross the Canadian border at locations other than official border checkpoints. To avoid the effects of the agreement, all refugees at a border crossing would be automatically repatriated to the United States, in accordance with the CAB provisions.  Since it is not illegal to cross the border outside a port of entry under the Immigration and Refugee Act or the rules associated with it, as long as the person immediately reports to a Canada Border Services Agency official and st.c.a. does not apply to rights outside a port of entry, these are persons who otherwise are not entitled to assert their rights after an irregular crossing. possible.  In some cases, these refugees have been amputated by frostbite and concerns have been expressed that some refugees may freeze to death while crossing the border.  A safe third country is a country in which a person transiting through that country could have applied for refugee protection. In Canada, section 102, paragraph 2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act sets out the criteria for designating a country as a safe third country.
According to the signatories, the STCA was created to preserve the integrity and effectiveness of the asylum and refugee system in Canada and the United States. The government says the agreement guarantees predictability and tighter control over asylum cases. The idea is that it would be difficult to regulate border crossings if asylum seekers do not use the right channels to file their claims. The government is calling for illegal immigration to disadvantage immigrants and refugees who go through the legal and sometimes laborious process of refugee decision-making. The agreements would effectively prevent migrants from sheltering at the southern border of the United States – and would continue to endanger the lives of thousands of people fleeing violence and poverty in the Rule Triangle region (El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala) and other countries. The Canadian Refugee Council strongly opposes this agreement because the United States is not a safe country for all refugees. The CCR also denounces the objective and impact of reducing the number of refugees who can seek refuge in Canada.